Limitations

It calculates the consequences of a trade you describe, checks that description against the rules you recorded, and keeps the record of what you decided and what happened. That is the whole product.

It does not tell you what to trade, when to trade, or whether a trade is a good idea. The words approved, safe, buy and sell are not in its vocabulary, and that is a deliberate constraint in the code, not a stylistic preference.

Maximelion holds no broker or exchange credentials. Every figure about your account — equity, balances, prop challenge state, realised profit and loss — is a value you typed. Nothing reconciles it against a venue, so an error you make in entry is an error the system will faithfully carry through every number derived from it.

• Fees, slippage and gap-fill prices are planning assumptions you supply. They are shown as assumptions on every result and are not predictions of your actual fill.
• The engine covers linear price-quantity contracts. Options, Greeks, and non-linear payoffs are not modelled at all.
• Correlation and risk ratios describe the window measured. They are not forecasts, and correlation in particular converges toward one during exactly the stress events diversification is meant to survive.
• Ratios are annualised on a 365-day basis because the instruments trade continuously. This is stated on each result rather than assumed to be understood.

Rule sets are the ones you entered and confirmed, with the date you confirmed them. Maximelion is not affiliated with any prop firm, does not receive their rules from them, and cannot tell you whether a firm has changed its terms since you last checked.

Nothing here is a guarantee of passing a challenge or of remaining compliant with one. A calculation that says you are inside a limit is a statement about the numbers you provided, not a promise about your account.

Every number is produced by deterministic code. No language model computes, adjusts, or overrides a calculation or a rule result.

Models are used only to structure and challenge the wording around a decision, and they receive a capital-free projection — never your positions or balances. A model cannot turn a rule conflict into a pass; that invariant is enforced in code and tested.

Retention, outcome accuracy, and any claim about whether using this product improves results are not yet measured. When they are measured, the numbers and their method will be published here and on the proof board. Until then, no such claim is made anywhere on this site.

Every public claim carries one of these evidence states, so you can tell a tested property from an intention without weighing the tone of the sentence:

If you find a claim on this site without one, or one you believe the evidence does not support, tell us and it will be corrected or removed.

Maximelion now offers assessment: it reads market conditions, your own recorded rules, and your history, and it tells you what it thinks. That judgement is the product, and it is worth having. It is also fallible, and the difference matters.

What it will not do is claim to know a future price. Nothing does. When you read an assessment here, you are reading an argument built from numbers you can check, not a forecast, and not a promise about an outcome. Every claim it makes is attached to a figure you can verify or dispute.

It is not a licensed financial adviser and does not know your full circumstances: your income, your obligations, your tax position, or what losing this money would mean for you. Those are the parts that decide whether a trade is wise, and they sit outside anything this software can see. The decision, and its consequence, remain yours.